January 26, 2006

AI Press Release: ‘China: Internet companies assist censorship’

Support Amnesty International(London/ Davos): Google’s launch of a self-censoring Chinese search engine is the latest in a string of examples of global Internet companies caving in to pressure from the Chinese government. The service curtails the rights of Chinese Internet users to the freedom of expression and freedom of information enjoyed in other countries.

Speaking from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Amnesty International’s Secretary General Irene Khan said:
“While acknowledging that Google has taken a number of steps to ensure access of Chinese users to the Internet, Amnesty International is nonetheless dismayed at the growing global trend in the IT industry.”

“Whether succumbing to demands from Chinese officials or anticipating government concerns, companies that impose restrictions that infringe on human rights are being extremely short-sighted. The agreements the industry enters into with the Chinese government, whether tacit or written, go against the IT industry’s claim that it promotes the right to freedom of information of all people, at all times, everywhere.”

Last year, Microsoft launched a portal in China that blocks use of words such as ‘freedom’ in blog text. The company recently closed down the blog of Zhao Jing, who used the blog name Michael An Ti, after he supported a strike against the politically-motivated sacking of an editor at the Beijing News.

Yahoo has admitted revealing email account details of the journalist Shi Tao to the Chinese authorities, who was peacefully exercising his right to impart information, a move that contributed to his prosecution and sentencing to 10 years in prison.

“Agreements between global corporations and the Chinese authorities has entrenched Internet censorship as the norm in China,” said Irene Khan. “Internet companies justify their actions on the basis of Chinese regulations. In fact, such agreements and the resulting self-censorship, violate both international standards and China’s own constitution, which protects freedom of expression.”

International law guarantees the right to freedom of information and the free flow of ideas across borders. While some restrictions on these have been developed over the years, the manner in which IT companies are freely submitting to opaque Chinese policies, is unacceptable.

“The Internet heralded unfettered access to information in a borderless world. Instead, companies are helping governments build borders to prevent their citizens from accessing information,” said Irene Khan.

- Read also PJM News: Google officially launching services in China

buzz it!


One Comment so far ...

The “IT industry” is not an actual entity and cannot therefore make any claims or enter into agreements.

Is what Google has done such a bad thing? The alternative isn’t really freedom of information, but no information at all. Who could possibly benefit from that?

Google made the deal to legitimize the use of its seach-engine in China and to reach the 120 million of chinese that have access to the internet. The chinese government will no longer command ISPs to block Google, because it will self-regulate.

The benefit to the chinese people will be enormous. After all, Google is a great search-engine.

The question is are they missing anything? The easy answer is “Yes, they will be missing the content that will be filtered-out by Google”. That is what some politicians and lobbyists would like you to think, but is it true?

Technically, there is no real way to impose any such measure. Google won’t direct you to any “forbidden” content if you live in China, but what’s to stop me from redirecting your queries through my own server to Google and then passing the content back to you (and to do this within an encrypted connection)? Mirroring and proxying are as old as the internet. And these are the simple and easy ways around the restrictions.

I can name a few others as well, but you get the point. But if I can come up with such an easy way to circumvent the restrictions, so can the people at Google. Who choose to not attraction any attention to the potential vulnerabilities of their regulatory measures. Don’t ask, don’t tell.

So why is everybody blaming Google? Because it’s easier to blame Google than to take on the Chinese government.

Comment on January 26, 2006 05:53 pm
(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)

Currently

Currently reading...