“Most people would rather die than think, and most people do.”
Bertrand Russell
Forget the intermediates in the fossil record. How about the missing link in the chain of thought of the religious?
How does one reconcile worshiping god and disparaging evolution and the scientific world view, to driving a car, using a telephone, watching television, and going to the doctor when you feel ill?
Compartmentalization is the usual answer but it doesn’t cut it in this case. Here’s why: compartmentalization comes into play when people are forced to cope with radically disparate, if not morally challenging, circumstances. There’s no clash or obvious conflict with taking your car to go to church, to denounce Darwin from the pulpit. There’s no need to compartmentalize.
So, if it’s not compartmentalization, what is the explanation? How do people reconcile technology and religion? How do people manage to live around the incongruity?
Ignorance
Well, I suspect they do not. They simply don’t bother – the don’t need to. (And is it any wonder how most of the few who are forced to acknowledge the incongruity choose to either ignore or deny it? Who likes to be told that they are wrong, and have been so for all their lives? — But that’s a discussion for some other time.) The incongruity is not obvious, certainly not to those conditioned by their upbringing to ignore it.
Intrinsic fallibility
Besides, our faculty of reason is not all that potent. Studies have shown that there is a long list of cognitive biases that color our reasoning all the time. So even when we are open to arguments that threaten our beliefs, we may fail to see reason, and we are more likely to fail on the side of caution, the more comfortable side, the side that does not threaten to upend our whole belief system.
Biology
Another popular recent argument is, of course, the religion meme. Whatever the truth is about memes, I think it does not really matter in this case. If there is such a thing as a religion meme, it is another motive to our many cognitive biases. Either way, I see no point in introducing intangible, unverified memes into the discussion, when cognitive biases are real.




